BackCF Industries Holdings Overview

CF Industries Holdings Other Current Liabilities

CF Industries Holdings's other current liabilities is $83M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Other Current Liabilities
$83.00M
1085.71% YoYΔ $76.00M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

CF Industries Holdings Other Current Liabilities History

Loading

CF Industries Holdings vs. peers: Other Current Liabilities Comparison

Loading

CF Industries Holdings Other Current Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

CF Industries Holdings (CF) FAQ

CF Industries Holdings posts a other current liabilities of $83M as of March 2026. That compares with $7M in the prior-year period — up 1085.7% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, CF Industries Holdings's other current liabilities was $7M. The latest reading is $83M — a 1085.7% year-over-year increase (period ending March 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Other Current Liabilities is one piece of CF Industries Holdings's financial statement story. At $83M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for CF's other current liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; CF Industries Holdings's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging CF Industries Holdings against Materials peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Materials are more comparable, which makes gaps in other current liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $83M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.