BackConnexa Sports Technologies Overview

Connexa Sports Technologies Current Cash

Track Connexa Sports Technologies's current cash ($36M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Current Cash
$35.71M
42561.11% YoYΔ $35.63M vs prior year quarter

Peer average / median

Loading

Connexa Sports Technologies Current Cash History

Loading

Connexa Sports Technologies vs. peers: Current Cash Comparison

Loading

Connexa Sports Technologies Cash Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Connexa Sports Technologies (YYAI) FAQ

Connexa Sports Technologies posts a current cash of $36M as of January 2026. That compares with $84K in the prior-year period — up 42561.1% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Connexa Sports Technologies's current cash was $84K. The latest reading is $36M — a 42561.1% year-over-year increase (period ending January 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Current Cash is one piece of Connexa Sports Technologies's financial statement story. At $36M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for YYAI's current cash usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Connexa Sports Technologies's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Connexa Sports Technologies against Consumer Discretionary peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Consumer Discretionary are more comparable, which makes gaps in current cash easier to interpret. Start with $36M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.