BackSelect Water Solutions Overview

Select Water Solutions Total Current Liabilities

Select Water Solutions's total current liabilities is $280M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Total Current Liabilities
$276.38M
26.17% YoYΔ $57.32M vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

Select Water Solutions Total Current Liabilities History

Loading

Select Water Solutions vs. peers: Total Current Liabilities Comparison

Loading

Select Water Solutions Total Current Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Select Water Solutions (WTTR) FAQ

Select Water Solutions posts a total current liabilities of $280M as of June 2026. That compares with $220M in the prior-year period — up 26.2% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Select Water Solutions's total current liabilities was $220M. The latest reading is $280M — a 26.2% year-over-year increase (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Total Current Liabilities is one piece of Select Water Solutions's financial statement story. At $280M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for WTTR's total current liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Select Water Solutions's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Select Water Solutions against Energy peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Energy are more comparable, which makes gaps in total current liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $280M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.