BackWhite Mountains Insurance Group, Overview

White Mountains Insurance Group, Long Term Debt

Track White Mountains Insurance Group,'s long-term debt ($0) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Long Term Debt
$0.00
100.00% YoYΔ $-676.10M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

White Mountains Insurance Group, Long Term Debt History

Loading

White Mountains Insurance Group, vs. peers: Long Term Debt Comparison

Loading

White Mountains Insurance Group, Long Term Debt Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

White Mountains Insurance Group, (WTM) FAQ

White Mountains Insurance Group, posts a long-term debt of $0 as of March 2026. That compares with $680M in the prior-year period — down 100.0% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, White Mountains Insurance Group,'s long-term debt was $680M. The latest reading is $0 — a 100.0% year-over-year decrease (period ending March 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Long-Term Debt is one piece of White Mountains Insurance Group,'s financial statement story. At $0, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for WTM's long-term debt usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; White Mountains Insurance Group,'s other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging White Mountains Insurance Group, against Finance peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Finance are more comparable, which makes gaps in long-term debt easier to interpret. Start with $0 here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.