BackWestern Asset Mortgage Capital Overview

Western Asset Mortgage Capital Total Liabilities

Track Western Asset Mortgage Capital's total liabilities ($2.2B) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Total Liabilities
$2.16B
13.98% YoYΔ $-350.57M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

Western Asset Mortgage Capital Total Liabilities History

Loading

Western Asset Mortgage Capital vs. peers: Total Liabilities Comparison

Loading

Western Asset Mortgage Capital Total Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Western Asset Mortgage Capital (WMC) FAQ

Western Asset Mortgage Capital posts a total liabilities of $2.2B as of September 2023. That compares with $2.5B in the prior-year period — down 14.0% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Western Asset Mortgage Capital's total liabilities was $2.5B. The latest reading is $2.2B — a 14.0% year-over-year decrease (period ending September 2023). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Total Liabilities is one piece of Western Asset Mortgage Capital's financial statement story. At $2.2B, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for WMC's total liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Western Asset Mortgage Capital's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Western Asset Mortgage Capital against Finance peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Finance are more comparable, which makes gaps in total liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $2.2B here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.