BackWISeKey International Holding Overview

WISeKey International Holding Accounts Payable

WISeKey International Holding's accounts payable is $5M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Accounts Payable
$4.99M
35.30% YoYΔ $1.30M vs prior year quarter

Peer average / median

Loading

WISeKey International Holding Accounts Payable History

Loading

WISeKey International Holding vs. peers: Accounts Payable Comparison

Loading

WISeKey International Holding Accounts Payable Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

WISeKey International Holding (WKEY) FAQ

WISeKey International Holding posts a accounts payable of $5M as of December 2025. That compares with $3.7M in the prior-year period — up 35.3% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, WISeKey International Holding's accounts payable was $3.7M. The latest reading is $5M — a 35.3% year-over-year increase (period ending December 2025). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Accounts Payable is one piece of WISeKey International Holding's financial statement story. At $5M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for WKEY's accounts payable usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; WISeKey International Holding's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging WISeKey International Holding against Technology peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Technology are more comparable, which makes gaps in accounts payable easier to interpret. Start with $5M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.