BackContextLogic Overview

ContextLogic Receivables

ContextLogic's receivables is $0.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Receivables
$0.00
↓ 100.00% YoYΔ $-8.00M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

ContextLogic Receivables History

Loading

ContextLogic vs. peers: Receivables Comparison

Loading

ContextLogic Receivables Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Balance Sheet Breakdown

Current CashShort Term InvestmentsReceivablesInventoryOther Current AssetsCurrent AssetsLong Term InvestmentsProperty Plant EquipmentGoodwillIntangible AssetsOther AssetsTotal AssetsNet Tangible AssetsAccounts PayableOther Current LiabilitiesTotal Current LiabilitiesLong Term DebtOther LiabilitiesMinority InterestTotal Liabilities

ContextLogic (WISH) FAQ

ContextLogic (WISH) currently reports a receivables of $0 as of March 2025. That compares with $8M in the prior-year period — down 100.0% year over year. Use the charts on this page to explore ContextLogic's receivables history and peer comparisons.

ContextLogic's receivables decreased from $8M to $0 — a 100.0% year-over-year decrease (period ending March 2025). Watching multi-year history on the chart below helps separate one-off swings from a lasting trend.

ContextLogic reported $0 in receivables as of March 2025. That compares with $8M in the prior-year period — down 100.0% year over year. Absolute dollar amounts are most useful when compared with prior periods, peers, and related line items such as revenue, assets, or liabilities on Stockcircle.

Start with the current receivables of $0, then check the historical chart for trend and the peer comparison chart for relative positioning. From there, open related valuation or income-statement pages for ContextLogic, and consider following WISH for alerts when major investors trade the stock.

ContextLogic is classified in the Consumer Discretionary sector. On receivables, it currently shows $0. Sector peers often share similar capital intensity and growth regimes, so relative rankings inside Consumer Discretionary are usually more informative than comparing WISH with unrelated industries.