BackWilhelmina International Overview

Wilhelmina International Intangible Assets

Track Wilhelmina International's intangible assets ($8.5M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Intangible Assets
$8.47M
0.00% YoYΔ $0.00 vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

Wilhelmina International Intangible Assets History

Loading

Wilhelmina International vs. peers: Intangible Assets Comparison

Loading

Wilhelmina International Intangible Assets Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Wilhelmina International (WHLM) FAQ

Wilhelmina International posts a intangible assets of $8.5M as of June 2025. That compares with $8.5M in the prior-year period — up 0.0% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Wilhelmina International's intangible assets was $8.5M. The latest reading is $8.5M — essentially flat versus a year earlier (period ending June 2025). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Intangible Assets is one piece of Wilhelmina International's financial statement story. At $8.5M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for WHLM's intangible assets usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Wilhelmina International's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Wilhelmina International against Industrials peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Industrials are more comparable, which makes gaps in intangible assets easier to interpret. Start with $8.5M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.