BackWaFd- 4.875% PRF PERPETUAL USD 25 - Ser A Overview

WaFd- 4.875% PRF PERPETUAL USD 25 - Ser A Goodwill

Latest goodwill for WAFDP: $0.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Goodwill
$0.00
100.00% YoYΔ $-414.72M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

WaFd- 4.875% PRF PERPETUAL USD 25 - Ser A Goodwill History

Loading

WaFd- 4.875% PRF PERPETUAL USD 25 - Ser A vs. peers: Goodwill Comparison

Loading

WaFd- 4.875% PRF PERPETUAL USD 25 - Ser A Goodwill Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

WaFd- 4.875% PRF PERPETUAL USD 25 - Ser A (WAFDP) FAQ

WaFd- 4.875% PRF PERPETUAL USD 25 - Ser A posts a goodwill of $0 as of June 2026. That compares with $410M in the prior-year period — down 100.0% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, WaFd- 4.875% PRF PERPETUAL USD 25 - Ser A's goodwill was $410M. The latest reading is $0 — a 100.0% year-over-year decrease (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Goodwill is one piece of WaFd- 4.875% PRF PERPETUAL USD 25 - Ser A's financial statement story. At $0, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for WAFDP's goodwill usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; WaFd- 4.875% PRF PERPETUAL USD 25 - Ser A's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging WaFd- 4.875% PRF PERPETUAL USD 25 - Ser A against Finance peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Finance are more comparable, which makes gaps in goodwill easier to interpret. Start with $0 here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.