BackVESTAS WIND SYSTEMS AS ADR Overview

VESTAS WIND SYSTEMS AS ADR Net Tangible Assets

VESTAS WIND SYSTEMS AS ADR's net tangible assets is $4.1B.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Net Tangible Assets
$4.05B
↓ 0.58% YoYΔ $-23.47M vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

VESTAS WIND SYSTEMS AS ADR Net Tangible Assets History

Loading

VESTAS WIND SYSTEMS AS ADR vs. peers: Net Tangible Assets Comparison

Loading

VESTAS WIND SYSTEMS AS ADR Net Tangible Assets Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

VESTAS WIND SYSTEMS AS ADR (VWDRY) FAQ

VESTAS WIND SYSTEMS AS ADR posts a net tangible assets of $4.1B as of September 2026. That compares with $4.1B in the prior-year period — down 0.6% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, VESTAS WIND SYSTEMS AS ADR's net tangible assets was $4.1B. The latest reading is $4.1B — a 0.6% year-over-year decrease (period ending September 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Net Tangible Assets is one piece of VESTAS WIND SYSTEMS AS ADR's financial statement story. At $4.1B, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for VWDRY's net tangible assets usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; VESTAS WIND SYSTEMS AS ADR's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging VESTAS WIND SYSTEMS AS ADR against Industrials peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Industrials are more comparable, which makes gaps in net tangible assets easier to interpret. Start with $4.1B here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.