BackCatheter Precision Overview

Catheter Precision Total Current Liabilities

Track Catheter Precision's total current liabilities ($20M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Total Current Liabilities
$19.74M
382.71% YoYΔ $15.65M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

Catheter Precision Total Current Liabilities History

Loading

Catheter Precision vs. peers: Total Current Liabilities Comparison

Loading

Catheter Precision Total Current Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Catheter Precision (VTAK) FAQ

Catheter Precision posts a total current liabilities of $20M as of March 2026. That compares with $4.1M in the prior-year period — up 382.7% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Catheter Precision's total current liabilities was $4.1M. The latest reading is $20M — a 382.7% year-over-year increase (period ending March 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Total Current Liabilities is one piece of Catheter Precision's financial statement story. At $20M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for VTAK's total current liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Catheter Precision's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Catheter Precision against Healthcare peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Healthcare are more comparable, which makes gaps in total current liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $20M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.