BackVersant Media Group Class A Overview

Versant Media Group Class A Profit Margin

Versant Media Group Class A (VSNT) has a profit margin of 11.48%, above the Consumer Discretionary sector average of 8.68%.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow

Quarterly Profit Margin

12.83%
↓ 27.41% YoY

As of Jun 2026

Annual Profit Margin (TTM)

11.48%

Trailing 12 months ending Jun 2026

Average Profit Margin (Comparison Companies)

Loading

Profit Margin History

Loading

Profit Margin Comparison

Loading

Annual Profit Margin Growth Rate (%)

Loading

Versant Media Group Class A (VSNT) FAQ

Versant Media Group Class A posts a profit margin of 11.48% as of June 2026. That is above the Consumer Discretionary sector average of 8.68%. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

For Consumer Discretionary stocks, a profit margin near 8.68% is typical. Versant Media Group Class A's 11.48% is higher that level. That is roughly 32.2% above the sector mean. Whether that is a warning or an opportunity depends on growth outlook and other fundamentals shown elsewhere on Stockcircle.

Versant Media Group Class A's profit margin moves when the underlying profit, equity, or asset base changes. Cost cuts, pricing power, buybacks, write-downs, and cyclical swings can all shift the percentage. The latest reading is 11.48% as of June 2026; use YoY and peer views to separate noise from signal.

Context for VSNT's profit margin usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers (average 8.68%), and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Versant Media Group Class A's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Versant Media Group Class A against Consumer Discretionary peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Consumer Discretionary are more comparable, which makes gaps in profit margin easier to interpret. Start with 11.48% here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.