BackVision Marine Technologies Overview

Vision Marine Technologies Net Tangible Assets

Vision Marine Technologies's net tangible assets is $6M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Net Tangible Assets
$6.03M
64.31% YoYΔ $-10.86M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

Vision Marine Technologies Net Tangible Assets History

Loading

Vision Marine Technologies vs. peers: Net Tangible Assets Comparison

Loading

Vision Marine Technologies Net Tangible Assets Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Vision Marine Technologies (VMAR) FAQ

Vision Marine Technologies posts a net tangible assets of $6M as of May 2026. That compares with $17M in the prior-year period — down 64.3% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Vision Marine Technologies's net tangible assets was $17M. The latest reading is $6M — a 64.3% year-over-year decrease (period ending May 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Net Tangible Assets is one piece of Vision Marine Technologies's financial statement story. At $6M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for VMAR's net tangible assets usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Vision Marine Technologies's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Vision Marine Technologies against Consumer Discretionary peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Consumer Discretionary are more comparable, which makes gaps in net tangible assets easier to interpret. Start with $6M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.