BackUniversal Security Instruments Overview

Universal Security Instruments Total Liabilities

Latest total liabilities for UUU: $1.3M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Total Liabilities
$1.27M
72.73% YoYΔ $-3.38M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

Universal Security Instruments Total Liabilities History

Loading

Universal Security Instruments vs. peers: Total Liabilities Comparison

Loading

Universal Security Instruments Total Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Universal Security Instruments (UUU) FAQ

Universal Security Instruments posts a total liabilities of $1.3M as of March 2026. That compares with $4.7M in the prior-year period — down 72.7% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Universal Security Instruments's total liabilities was $4.7M. The latest reading is $1.3M — a 72.7% year-over-year decrease (period ending March 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Total Liabilities is one piece of Universal Security Instruments's financial statement story. At $1.3M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for UUU's total liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Universal Security Instruments's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Universal Security Instruments against Technology peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Technology are more comparable, which makes gaps in total liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $1.3M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.