BackUniversal Stainless & Alloy Products Overview

Universal Stainless & Alloy Products Total Current Liabilities

Track Universal Stainless & Alloy Products's total current liabilities ($48M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Total Current Liabilities
$48.45M
7.87% YoYΔ $3.53M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

Universal Stainless & Alloy Products Total Current Liabilities History

Loading

Universal Stainless & Alloy Products vs. peers: Total Current Liabilities Comparison

Loading

Universal Stainless & Alloy Products Total Current Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Universal Stainless & Alloy Products (USAP) FAQ

Universal Stainless & Alloy Products posts a total current liabilities of $48M as of September 2024. That compares with $45M in the prior-year period — up 7.9% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Universal Stainless & Alloy Products's total current liabilities was $45M. The latest reading is $48M — a 7.9% year-over-year increase (period ending September 2024). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Total Current Liabilities is one piece of Universal Stainless & Alloy Products's financial statement story. At $48M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for USAP's total current liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Universal Stainless & Alloy Products's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Universal Stainless & Alloy Products against Materials peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Materials are more comparable, which makes gaps in total current liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $48M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.