BackUSA Compression Partners LP - Unit Overview

USA Compression Partners LP - Unit Long Term Debt

Latest long-term debt for USAC: $14M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Long Term Debt
$13.70M
99.46% YoYΔ $-2.53B vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

USA Compression Partners LP - Unit Long Term Debt History

Loading

USA Compression Partners LP - Unit vs. peers: Long Term Debt Comparison

Loading

USA Compression Partners LP - Unit Long Term Debt Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

USA Compression Partners LP - Unit (USAC) FAQ

USA Compression Partners LP - Unit posts a long-term debt of $14M as of March 2026. That compares with $2.5B in the prior-year period — down 99.5% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, USA Compression Partners LP - Unit's long-term debt was $2.5B. The latest reading is $14M — a 99.5% year-over-year decrease (period ending March 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Long-Term Debt is one piece of USA Compression Partners LP - Unit's financial statement story. At $14M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for USAC's long-term debt usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; USA Compression Partners LP - Unit's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging USA Compression Partners LP - Unit against Energy peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Energy are more comparable, which makes gaps in long-term debt easier to interpret. Start with $14M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.