BackMammoth Energy Services Overview

Mammoth Energy Services Other Current Liabilities

Track Mammoth Energy Services's other current liabilities ($20M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Other Current Liabilities
$20.17M
39.33% YoYΔ $-13.08M vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

Mammoth Energy Services Other Current Liabilities History

Loading

Mammoth Energy Services vs. peers: Other Current Liabilities Comparison

Loading

Mammoth Energy Services Other Current Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Mammoth Energy Services (TUSK) FAQ

Mammoth Energy Services posts a other current liabilities of $20M as of June 2026. That compares with $33M in the prior-year period — down 39.3% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Mammoth Energy Services's other current liabilities was $33M. The latest reading is $20M — a 39.3% year-over-year decrease (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Other Current Liabilities is one piece of Mammoth Energy Services's financial statement story. At $20M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for TUSK's other current liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Mammoth Energy Services's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Mammoth Energy Services against Energy peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Energy are more comparable, which makes gaps in other current liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $20M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.