BackTuesday Morning - New Overview

Tuesday Morning - New Other Current Liabilities

Latest other current liabilities for TUEM: $34M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Other Current Liabilities
$34.04M
25.87% YoYΔ $-11.88M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

Tuesday Morning - New Other Current Liabilities History

Loading

Tuesday Morning - New vs. peers: Other Current Liabilities Comparison

Loading

Tuesday Morning - New Other Current Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Tuesday Morning - New (TUEM) FAQ

Tuesday Morning - New posts a other current liabilities of $34M as of June 2020. That compares with $46M in the prior-year period — down 25.9% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Tuesday Morning - New's other current liabilities was $46M. The latest reading is $34M — a 25.9% year-over-year decrease (period ending June 2020). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Other Current Liabilities is one piece of Tuesday Morning - New's financial statement story. At $34M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for TUEM's other current liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Tuesday Morning - New's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Tuesday Morning - New against Consumer Discretionary peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Consumer Discretionary are more comparable, which makes gaps in other current liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $34M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.