BackTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Overview

Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Receivables

Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing's receivables is $440B.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Receivables
$440.92B
87.08% YoYΔ $205.23B vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Receivables History

Loading

Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing vs. peers: Receivables Comparison

Loading

Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Receivables Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing (TSM) FAQ

Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing posts a receivables of $440B as of June 2026. That compares with $240B in the prior-year period — up 87.1% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing's receivables was $240B. The latest reading is $440B — a 87.1% year-over-year increase (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Receivables is one piece of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing's financial statement story. At $440B, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for TSM's receivables usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing against Technology peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Technology are more comparable, which makes gaps in receivables easier to interpret. Start with $440B here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.