BackTrio-Tech International Overview

Trio-Tech International Other Current Assets

Track Trio-Tech International's other current assets ($3.9M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Other Current Assets
$3.93M
49.69% YoYΔ $-3.88M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

Trio-Tech International Other Current Assets History

Loading

Trio-Tech International vs. peers: Other Current Assets Comparison

Loading

Trio-Tech International Other Current Assets Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Trio-Tech International (TRT) FAQ

Trio-Tech International posts a other current assets of $3.9M as of March 2026. That compares with $7.8M in the prior-year period — down 49.7% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Trio-Tech International's other current assets was $7.8M. The latest reading is $3.9M — a 49.7% year-over-year decrease (period ending March 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Other Current Assets is one piece of Trio-Tech International's financial statement story. At $3.9M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for TRT's other current assets usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Trio-Tech International's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Trio-Tech International against Technology peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Technology are more comparable, which makes gaps in other current assets easier to interpret. Start with $3.9M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.