BackTaylor Morrison Home Overview

Taylor Morrison Home Total Current Liabilities

Track Taylor Morrison Home's total current liabilities ($260M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Total Current Liabilities
$263.69M
60.13% YoYΔ $-397.66M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

Taylor Morrison Home Total Current Liabilities History

Loading

Taylor Morrison Home vs. peers: Total Current Liabilities Comparison

Loading

Taylor Morrison Home Total Current Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Taylor Morrison Home (TMHC) FAQ

Taylor Morrison Home posts a total current liabilities of $260M as of March 2026. That compares with $660M in the prior-year period — down 60.1% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Taylor Morrison Home's total current liabilities was $660M. The latest reading is $260M — a 60.1% year-over-year decrease (period ending March 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Total Current Liabilities is one piece of Taylor Morrison Home's financial statement story. At $260M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for TMHC's total current liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Taylor Morrison Home's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Taylor Morrison Home against Real Estate peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Real Estate are more comparable, which makes gaps in total current liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $260M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.