BackNEOS Enhanced Income 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF Overview

NEOS Enhanced Income 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF Goodwill

Track NEOS Enhanced Income 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF's goodwill ($260M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Goodwill
$259.68M
↑ 4.67% YoYΔ $11.59M vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

NEOS Enhanced Income 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF Goodwill History

Loading

NEOS Enhanced Income 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF vs. peers: Goodwill Comparison

Loading

NEOS Enhanced Income 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF Goodwill Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

NEOS Enhanced Income 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLTI) FAQ

NEOS Enhanced Income 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF posts a goodwill of $260M as of January 2018. That compares with $250M in the prior-year period — up 4.7% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, NEOS Enhanced Income 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF's goodwill was $250M. The latest reading is $260M — a 4.7% year-over-year increase (period ending January 2018). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Goodwill is one piece of NEOS Enhanced Income 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF's financial statement story. At $260M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for TLTI's goodwill usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; NEOS Enhanced Income 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging NEOS Enhanced Income 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF against Finance peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Finance are more comparable, which makes gaps in goodwill easier to interpret. Start with $260M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.