BackThor Industries Overview

Thor Industries Other Current Liabilities

Track Thor Industries's other current liabilities ($720M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Other Current Liabilities
$719.76M
11.41% YoYΔ $-92.70M vs prior year quarter

Peer average / median

Loading

Thor Industries Other Current Liabilities History

Loading

Thor Industries vs. peers: Other Current Liabilities Comparison

Loading

Thor Industries Other Current Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Thor Industries (THO) FAQ

Thor Industries posts a other current liabilities of $720M as of April 2026. That compares with $810M in the prior-year period — down 11.4% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Thor Industries's other current liabilities was $810M. The latest reading is $720M — a 11.4% year-over-year decrease (period ending April 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Other Current Liabilities is one piece of Thor Industries's financial statement story. At $720M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for THO's other current liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Thor Industries's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Thor Industries against Consumer Discretionary peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Consumer Discretionary are more comparable, which makes gaps in other current liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $720M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.