BackTextainer Group Holdings Limited Overview

Textainer Group Holdings Limited Net Tangible Assets

Latest net tangible assets for TGH: $2B.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Net Tangible Assets
$1.98B
16.80% YoYΔ $285.06M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

Textainer Group Holdings Limited Net Tangible Assets History

Loading

Textainer Group Holdings Limited vs. peers: Net Tangible Assets Comparison

Loading

Textainer Group Holdings Limited Net Tangible Assets Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Textainer Group Holdings Limited (TGH) FAQ

Textainer Group Holdings Limited posts a net tangible assets of $2B as of December 2023. That compares with $1.7B in the prior-year period — up 16.8% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Textainer Group Holdings Limited's net tangible assets was $1.7B. The latest reading is $2B — a 16.8% year-over-year increase (period ending December 2023). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Net Tangible Assets is one piece of Textainer Group Holdings Limited's financial statement story. At $2B, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for TGH's net tangible assets usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Textainer Group Holdings Limited's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Textainer Group Holdings Limited against Real Estate peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Real Estate are more comparable, which makes gaps in net tangible assets easier to interpret. Start with $2B here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.