BackTaseko Mines Limited Overview

Taseko Mines Limited Total Current Liabilities

Track Taseko Mines Limited's total current liabilities ($110B) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Total Current Liabilities
$108.72B
↑ 31.11% YoYΔ $25.80B vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

Taseko Mines Limited Total Current Liabilities History

Loading

Taseko Mines Limited vs. peers: Total Current Liabilities Comparison

Loading

Taseko Mines Limited Total Current Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Taseko Mines Limited (TGBMF) FAQ

Taseko Mines Limited (TGBMF) currently reports a total current liabilities of $110B as of June 2026. That compares with $83B in the prior-year period — up 31.1% year over year. Use the charts on this page to explore Taseko Mines Limited's total current liabilities history and peer comparisons.

Taseko Mines Limited's total current liabilities increased from $83B to $110B — a 31.1% year-over-year increase (period ending June 2026). Watching multi-year history on the chart below helps separate one-off swings from a lasting trend.

Taseko Mines Limited reported $110B in total current liabilities as of June 2026. That compares with $83B in the prior-year period — up 31.1% year over year. Absolute dollar amounts are most useful when compared with prior periods, peers, and related line items such as revenue, assets, or liabilities on Stockcircle.

Start with the current total current liabilities of $110B, then check the historical chart for trend and the peer comparison chart for relative positioning. From there, open related valuation or income-statement pages for Taseko Mines Limited, and consider following TGBMF for alerts when major investors trade the stock.

Taseko Mines Limited is classified in the Materials sector. On total current liabilities, it currently shows $110B. Sector peers often share similar capital intensity and growth regimes, so relative rankings inside Materials are usually more informative than comparing TGBMF with unrelated industries.