BackAT&T - 5.625% NT REDEEM 01/08/2067 USD 25 Overview

AT&T - 5.625% NT REDEEM 01/08/2067 USD 25 Receivables

Latest receivables for TBC: $8.5B.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Receivables
$8.52B
3.65% YoYΔ $-323.00M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

AT&T - 5.625% NT REDEEM 01/08/2067 USD 25 Receivables History

Loading

AT&T - 5.625% NT REDEEM 01/08/2067 USD 25 vs. peers: Receivables Comparison

Loading

AT&T - 5.625% NT REDEEM 01/08/2067 USD 25 Receivables Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

AT&T - 5.625% NT REDEEM 01/08/2067 USD 25 (TBC) FAQ

AT&T - 5.625% NT REDEEM 01/08/2067 USD 25 posts a receivables of $8.5B as of June 2026. That compares with $8.8B in the prior-year period — down 3.7% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, AT&T - 5.625% NT REDEEM 01/08/2067 USD 25's receivables was $8.8B. The latest reading is $8.5B — a 3.7% year-over-year decrease (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Receivables is one piece of AT&T - 5.625% NT REDEEM 01/08/2067 USD 25's financial statement story. At $8.5B, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for TBC's receivables usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; AT&T - 5.625% NT REDEEM 01/08/2067 USD 25's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging AT&T - 5.625% NT REDEEM 01/08/2067 USD 25 against Telecommunications peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Telecommunications are more comparable, which makes gaps in receivables easier to interpret. Start with $8.5B here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.