BackSSR Mining Overview

SSR Mining Minority Interest

Track SSR Mining's minority interest ($0) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Minority Interest
$0.00
↓ 100.00% YoYΔ $-827.61M vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

SSR Mining Minority Interest History

Loading

SSR Mining vs. peers: Minority Interest Comparison

Loading

SSR Mining Minority Interest Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Balance Sheet Breakdown

Current CashShort Term InvestmentsReceivablesInventoryOther Current AssetsCurrent AssetsLong Term InvestmentsProperty Plant EquipmentGoodwillIntangible AssetsOther AssetsTotal AssetsNet Tangible AssetsAccounts PayableOther Current LiabilitiesTotal Current LiabilitiesLong Term DebtOther LiabilitiesMinority InterestTotal Liabilities

SSR Mining (SSRM) FAQ

SSR Mining posts a minority interest of $0 as of June 2026. That compares with $830M in the prior-year period — down 100.0% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, SSR Mining's minority interest was $830M. The latest reading is $0 — a 100.0% year-over-year decrease (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Minority Interest is one piece of SSR Mining's financial statement story. At $0, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for SSRM's minority interest usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; SSR Mining's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging SSR Mining against Materials peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Materials are more comparable, which makes gaps in minority interest easier to interpret. Start with $0 here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.