BackSS&C Technologies Holdings Overview

SS&C Technologies Holdings Receivables

Track SS&C Technologies Holdings's receivables ($1B) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Receivables
$1.02B
↓ 67.27% YoYΔ $-2.10B vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

SS&C Technologies Holdings Receivables History

Loading

SS&C Technologies Holdings vs. peers: Receivables Comparison

Loading

SS&C Technologies Holdings Receivables Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

SS&C Technologies Holdings (SSNC) FAQ

SS&C Technologies Holdings posts a receivables of $1B as of June 2026. That compares with $3.1B in the prior-year period — down 67.3% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, SS&C Technologies Holdings's receivables was $3.1B. The latest reading is $1B — a 67.3% year-over-year decrease (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Receivables is one piece of SS&C Technologies Holdings's financial statement story. At $1B, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for SSNC's receivables usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; SS&C Technologies Holdings's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging SS&C Technologies Holdings against Technology peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Technology are more comparable, which makes gaps in receivables easier to interpret. Start with $1B here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.