BackSempra - 5.75% NT REDEEM 01/07/2079 USD 25 Overview

Sempra - 5.75% NT REDEEM 01/07/2079 USD 25 Receivables

Latest receivables for SREA: $500M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Receivables
$496.00M
↓ 77.41% YoYΔ $-1.70B vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

Sempra - 5.75% NT REDEEM 01/07/2079 USD 25 Receivables History

Loading

Sempra - 5.75% NT REDEEM 01/07/2079 USD 25 vs. peers: Receivables Comparison

Loading

Sempra - 5.75% NT REDEEM 01/07/2079 USD 25 Receivables Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Sempra - 5.75% NT REDEEM 01/07/2079 USD 25 (SREA) FAQ

Sempra - 5.75% NT REDEEM 01/07/2079 USD 25 posts a receivables of $500M as of June 2026. That compares with $2.2B in the prior-year period — down 77.4% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Sempra - 5.75% NT REDEEM 01/07/2079 USD 25's receivables was $2.2B. The latest reading is $500M — a 77.4% year-over-year decrease (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Receivables is one piece of Sempra - 5.75% NT REDEEM 01/07/2079 USD 25's financial statement story. At $500M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for SREA's receivables usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Sempra - 5.75% NT REDEEM 01/07/2079 USD 25's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Sempra - 5.75% NT REDEEM 01/07/2079 USD 25 against Energy peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Energy are more comparable, which makes gaps in receivables easier to interpret. Start with $500M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.