BackSportsman`s Warehouse Holdings Overview

Sportsman`s Warehouse Holdings Total Liabilities

Latest total liabilities for SPWH: $670M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Total Liabilities
$670.80M
6.13% YoYΔ $-43.81M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

Sportsman`s Warehouse Holdings Total Liabilities History

Loading

Sportsman`s Warehouse Holdings vs. peers: Total Liabilities Comparison

Loading

Sportsman`s Warehouse Holdings Total Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Sportsman`s Warehouse Holdings (SPWH) FAQ

Sportsman`s Warehouse Holdings posts a total liabilities of $670M as of May 2026. That compares with $710M in the prior-year period — down 6.1% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Sportsman`s Warehouse Holdings's total liabilities was $710M. The latest reading is $670M — a 6.1% year-over-year decrease (period ending May 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Total Liabilities is one piece of Sportsman`s Warehouse Holdings's financial statement story. At $670M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for SPWH's total liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Sportsman`s Warehouse Holdings's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Sportsman`s Warehouse Holdings against Consumer Discretionary peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Consumer Discretionary are more comparable, which makes gaps in total liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $670M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.