BackSpruce Power Holding Overview

Spruce Power Holding Total Current Liabilities

Spruce Power Holding's total current liabilities is $230M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Total Current Liabilities
$231.01M
288.94% YoYΔ $171.62M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

Spruce Power Holding Total Current Liabilities History

Loading

Spruce Power Holding vs. peers: Total Current Liabilities Comparison

Loading

Spruce Power Holding Total Current Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Spruce Power Holding (SPRU) FAQ

Spruce Power Holding posts a total current liabilities of $230M as of March 2026. That compares with $59M in the prior-year period — up 288.9% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Spruce Power Holding's total current liabilities was $59M. The latest reading is $230M — a 288.9% year-over-year increase (period ending March 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Total Current Liabilities is one piece of Spruce Power Holding's financial statement story. At $230M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for SPRU's total current liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Spruce Power Holding's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Spruce Power Holding against Consumer Discretionary peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Consumer Discretionary are more comparable, which makes gaps in total current liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $230M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.