BackSteel Partners Holdings LP - Unit Overview

Steel Partners Holdings LP - Unit Operating Income

Track Steel Partners Holdings LP - Unit's operating income ($240M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow

Quarterly Operating Income

$91.93M
194.73% YoY

As of Sep 30, 2025

Annual Operating Income (TTM)

$239.07M
421.52% YoY

Trailing 12 months ending Sep 30, 2025

Average Operating Income (Comparison Companies)

Operating Income History

Operating Income Comparison

Annual Operating Income Growth Rate (%)

Annual Operating Income Growth (Absolute)

Steel Partners Holdings LP - Unit (SPLP) FAQ

Steel Partners Holdings LP - Unit posts a operating income of $240M as of September 2025. That compares with $46M in the prior-year period — up 421.5% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Steel Partners Holdings LP - Unit's operating income was $46M. The latest reading is $240M — a 421.5% year-over-year increase (period ending September 2025). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Operating Income is one piece of Steel Partners Holdings LP - Unit's financial statement story. At $240M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for SPLP's operating income usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Steel Partners Holdings LP - Unit's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Steel Partners Holdings LP - Unit against Finance peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Finance are more comparable, which makes gaps in operating income easier to interpret. Start with $240M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.