BackSpectrum Brands Holdings Overview

Spectrum Brands Holdings Net Tangible Assets

Track Spectrum Brands Holdings's net tangible assets ($1.9B) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Net Tangible Assets
$1.90B
0.82% YoYΔ $15.40M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

Spectrum Brands Holdings Net Tangible Assets History

Loading

Spectrum Brands Holdings vs. peers: Net Tangible Assets Comparison

Loading

Spectrum Brands Holdings Net Tangible Assets Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Spectrum Brands Holdings (SPB) FAQ

Spectrum Brands Holdings posts a net tangible assets of $1.9B as of March 2026. That compares with $1.9B in the prior-year period — up 0.8% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Spectrum Brands Holdings's net tangible assets was $1.9B. The latest reading is $1.9B — a 0.8% year-over-year increase (period ending March 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Net Tangible Assets is one piece of Spectrum Brands Holdings's financial statement story. At $1.9B, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for SPB's net tangible assets usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Spectrum Brands Holdings's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Spectrum Brands Holdings against Finance peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Finance are more comparable, which makes gaps in net tangible assets easier to interpret. Start with $1.9B here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.