BackSnowflake Overview

Snowflake Receivables

Track Snowflake's receivables ($720M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Receivables
$718.46M
↑ 11.10% YoYΔ $71.78M vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

Snowflake Receivables History

Loading

Snowflake vs. peers: Receivables Comparison

Loading

Snowflake Receivables Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Balance Sheet Breakdown

Current CashShort Term InvestmentsReceivablesInventoryOther Current AssetsCurrent AssetsLong Term InvestmentsProperty Plant EquipmentGoodwillIntangible AssetsOther AssetsTotal AssetsNet Tangible AssetsAccounts PayableOther Current LiabilitiesTotal Current LiabilitiesLong Term DebtOther LiabilitiesMinority InterestTotal Liabilities

Snowflake (SNOW) FAQ

Snowflake (SNOW) currently reports a receivables of $720M as of July 2026. That compares with $650M in the prior-year period — up 11.1% year over year. Use the charts on this page to explore Snowflake's receivables history and peer comparisons.

Snowflake's receivables increased from $650M to $720M — a 11.1% year-over-year increase (period ending July 2026). Watching multi-year history on the chart below helps separate one-off swings from a lasting trend.

Snowflake reported $720M in receivables as of July 2026. That compares with $650M in the prior-year period — up 11.1% year over year. Absolute dollar amounts are most useful when compared with prior periods, peers, and related line items such as revenue, assets, or liabilities on Stockcircle.

Start with the current receivables of $720M, then check the historical chart for trend and the peer comparison chart for relative positioning. From there, open related valuation or income-statement pages for Snowflake, and consider following SNOW for alerts when major investors trade the stock.

Snowflake is classified in the Technology sector. On receivables, it currently shows $720M. Sector peers often share similar capital intensity and growth regimes, so relative rankings inside Technology are usually more informative than comparing SNOW with unrelated industries.