BackSisecam Resources LP - Unit Overview

Sisecam Resources LP - Unit Long Term Debt

Track Sisecam Resources LP - Unit's long-term debt ($120M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Long Term Debt
$115.90M
18.84% YoYΔ $-26.90M vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

Sisecam Resources LP - Unit Long Term Debt History

Loading

Sisecam Resources LP - Unit vs. peers: Long Term Debt Comparison

Loading

Sisecam Resources LP - Unit Long Term Debt Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Sisecam Resources LP - Unit (SIRE) FAQ

Sisecam Resources LP - Unit posts a long-term debt of $120M as of March 2023. That compares with $140M in the prior-year period — down 18.8% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Sisecam Resources LP - Unit's long-term debt was $140M. The latest reading is $120M — a 18.8% year-over-year decrease (period ending March 2023). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Long-Term Debt is one piece of Sisecam Resources LP - Unit's financial statement story. At $120M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for SIRE's long-term debt usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Sisecam Resources LP - Unit's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Sisecam Resources LP - Unit against Materials peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Materials are more comparable, which makes gaps in long-term debt easier to interpret. Start with $120M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.