BackGrupo Simec S.A.B. de C.V. Overview

Grupo Simec S.A.B. de C.V. Other Current Assets

Grupo Simec S.A.B. de C.V.'s other current assets is $160M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Other Current Assets
$157.25M
77.04% YoYΔ $-527.74M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

Grupo Simec S.A.B. de C.V. Other Current Assets History

Loading

Grupo Simec S.A.B. de C.V. vs. peers: Other Current Assets Comparison

Loading

Grupo Simec S.A.B. de C.V. Other Current Assets Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Grupo Simec S.A.B. de C.V. (SIM) FAQ

Grupo Simec S.A.B. de C.V. posts a other current assets of $160M as of March 2026. That compares with $680M in the prior-year period — down 77.0% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Grupo Simec S.A.B. de C.V.'s other current assets was $680M. The latest reading is $160M — a 77.0% year-over-year decrease (period ending March 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Other Current Assets is one piece of Grupo Simec S.A.B. de C.V.'s financial statement story. At $160M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for SIM's other current assets usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Grupo Simec S.A.B. de C.V.'s other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Grupo Simec S.A.B. de C.V. against Materials peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Materials are more comparable, which makes gaps in other current assets easier to interpret. Start with $160M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.