BackShell Midstream Partners L.P. - Unit Overview

Shell Midstream Partners L.P. - Unit Receivables

Track Shell Midstream Partners L.P. - Unit's receivables ($51M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Receivables
$51.00M
10.87% YoYΔ $5.00M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

Shell Midstream Partners L.P. - Unit Receivables History

Loading

Shell Midstream Partners L.P. - Unit vs. peers: Receivables Comparison

Loading

Shell Midstream Partners L.P. - Unit Receivables Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Shell Midstream Partners L.P. - Unit (SHLX) FAQ

Shell Midstream Partners L.P. - Unit posts a receivables of $51M as of June 2022. That compares with $46M in the prior-year period — up 10.9% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Shell Midstream Partners L.P. - Unit's receivables was $46M. The latest reading is $51M — a 10.9% year-over-year increase (period ending June 2022). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Receivables is one piece of Shell Midstream Partners L.P. - Unit's financial statement story. At $51M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for SHLX's receivables usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Shell Midstream Partners L.P. - Unit's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Shell Midstream Partners L.P. - Unit against Energy peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Energy are more comparable, which makes gaps in receivables easier to interpret. Start with $51M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.