BackSeanergy Maritime Holdings - Warrants Overview

Seanergy Maritime Holdings - Warrants Net Tangible Assets

Latest net tangible assets for SHIPW: $310M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Net Tangible Assets
$313.11M
21.48% YoYΔ $55.37M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

Seanergy Maritime Holdings - Warrants Net Tangible Assets History

Loading

Seanergy Maritime Holdings - Warrants vs. peers: Net Tangible Assets Comparison

Loading

Seanergy Maritime Holdings - Warrants Net Tangible Assets Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Seanergy Maritime Holdings - Warrants (SHIPW) FAQ

Seanergy Maritime Holdings - Warrants (SHIPW) currently reports a net tangible assets of $310M as of June 2026. That compares with $260M in the prior-year period — up 21.5% year over year. Use the charts on this page to explore Seanergy Maritime Holdings - Warrants's net tangible assets history and peer comparisons.

Seanergy Maritime Holdings - Warrants's net tangible assets increased from $260M to $310M — a 21.5% year-over-year increase (period ending June 2026). Watching multi-year history on the chart below helps separate one-off swings from a lasting trend.

Seanergy Maritime Holdings - Warrants reported $310M in net tangible assets as of June 2026. That compares with $260M in the prior-year period — up 21.5% year over year. Absolute dollar amounts are most useful when compared with prior periods, peers, and related line items such as revenue, assets, or liabilities on Stockcircle.

Start with the current net tangible assets of $310M, then check the historical chart for trend and the peer comparison chart for relative positioning. From there, open related valuation or income-statement pages for Seanergy Maritime Holdings - Warrants, and consider following SHIPW for alerts when major investors trade the stock.

Seanergy Maritime Holdings - Warrants is classified in the Industrials sector. On net tangible assets, it currently shows $310M. Sector peers often share similar capital intensity and growth regimes, so relative rankings inside Industrials are usually more informative than comparing SHIPW with unrelated industries.