BackSGL Carbon SE Overview

SGL Carbon SE Receivables

Track SGL Carbon SE's receivables ($110M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Receivables
$114.93M
↓ 38.67% YoYΔ $-72.47M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

SGL Carbon SE Receivables History

Loading

SGL Carbon SE vs. peers: Receivables Comparison

Loading

SGL Carbon SE Receivables Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Balance Sheet Breakdown

Current CashShort Term InvestmentsReceivablesInventoryOther Current AssetsCurrent AssetsLong Term InvestmentsProperty Plant EquipmentGoodwillIntangible AssetsOther AssetsTotal AssetsNet Tangible AssetsAccounts PayableOther Current LiabilitiesTotal Current LiabilitiesLong Term DebtOther LiabilitiesMinority InterestTotal Liabilities

SGL Carbon SE (SGLFF) FAQ

SGL Carbon SE posts a receivables of $110M as of March 2026. That compares with $190M in the prior-year period — down 38.7% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, SGL Carbon SE's receivables was $190M. The latest reading is $110M — a 38.7% year-over-year decrease (period ending March 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Receivables is one piece of SGL Carbon SE's financial statement story. At $110M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for SGLFF's receivables usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; SGL Carbon SE's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging SGL Carbon SE against Industrials peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Industrials are more comparable, which makes gaps in receivables easier to interpret. Start with $110M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.