BackSigma Labs- Warrants (15/02/2022) Overview

Sigma Labs- Warrants (15/02/2022) Goodwill

Track Sigma Labs- Warrants (15/02/2022)'s goodwill ($3.1M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Goodwill
$3.12M
10.11% YoYΔ $286824.00 vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

Sigma Labs- Warrants (15/02/2022) Goodwill History

Loading

Sigma Labs- Warrants (15/02/2022) vs. peers: Goodwill Comparison

Loading

Sigma Labs- Warrants (15/02/2022) Goodwill Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Sigma Labs- Warrants (15/02/2022) (SGLBW) FAQ

Sigma Labs- Warrants (15/02/2022) posts a goodwill of $3.1M as of May 2026. That compares with $2.8M in the prior-year period — up 10.1% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Sigma Labs- Warrants (15/02/2022)'s goodwill was $2.8M. The latest reading is $3.1M — a 10.1% year-over-year increase (period ending May 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Goodwill is one piece of Sigma Labs- Warrants (15/02/2022)'s financial statement story. At $3.1M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for SGLBW's goodwill usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Sigma Labs- Warrants (15/02/2022)'s other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Sigma Labs- Warrants (15/02/2022) against Industrials peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Industrials are more comparable, which makes gaps in goodwill easier to interpret. Start with $3.1M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.