BackGlobal Internet of People Overview

Global Internet of People Net Tangible Assets

Global Internet of People's net tangible assets is $27M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Net Tangible Assets
$27.29M
39.79% YoYΔ $-18.04M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

Global Internet of People Net Tangible Assets History

Loading

Global Internet of People vs. peers: Net Tangible Assets Comparison

Loading

Global Internet of People Net Tangible Assets Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Global Internet of People (SDH) FAQ

Global Internet of People posts a net tangible assets of $27M as of December 2024. That compares with $45M in the prior-year period — down 39.8% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Global Internet of People's net tangible assets was $45M. The latest reading is $27M — a 39.8% year-over-year decrease (period ending December 2024). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Net Tangible Assets is one piece of Global Internet of People's financial statement story. At $27M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for SDH's net tangible assets usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Global Internet of People's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Global Internet of People against Industrials peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Industrials are more comparable, which makes gaps in net tangible assets easier to interpret. Start with $27M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.