BackSilverBow Resources Overview

SilverBow Resources Total Current Liabilities

Track SilverBow Resources's total current liabilities ($350M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Total Current Liabilities
$353.48M
159.06% YoYΔ $217.03M vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

SilverBow Resources Total Current Liabilities History

Loading

SilverBow Resources vs. peers: Total Current Liabilities Comparison

Loading

SilverBow Resources Total Current Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

SilverBow Resources (SBOW) FAQ

SilverBow Resources posts a total current liabilities of $350M as of March 2024. That compares with $140M in the prior-year period — up 159.1% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, SilverBow Resources's total current liabilities was $140M. The latest reading is $350M — a 159.1% year-over-year increase (period ending March 2024). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Total Current Liabilities is one piece of SilverBow Resources's financial statement story. At $350M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for SBOW's total current liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; SilverBow Resources's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging SilverBow Resources against Energy peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Energy are more comparable, which makes gaps in total current liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $350M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.