BackSplash Beverage Group Overview

Splash Beverage Group Total Current Liabilities

Track Splash Beverage Group's total current liabilities ($17M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Total Current Liabilities
$16.97M
16.88% YoYΔ $-3.45M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

Splash Beverage Group Total Current Liabilities History

Loading

Splash Beverage Group vs. peers: Total Current Liabilities Comparison

Loading

Splash Beverage Group Total Current Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Splash Beverage Group (SBEV) FAQ

Splash Beverage Group posts a total current liabilities of $17M as of March 2026. That compares with $20M in the prior-year period — down 16.9% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Splash Beverage Group's total current liabilities was $20M. The latest reading is $17M — a 16.9% year-over-year decrease (period ending March 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Total Current Liabilities is one piece of Splash Beverage Group's financial statement story. At $17M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for SBEV's total current liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Splash Beverage Group's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Splash Beverage Group against Healthcare peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Healthcare are more comparable, which makes gaps in total current liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $17M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.