BackStrongbridge Biopharma plc Overview

Strongbridge Biopharma plc Net Tangible Assets

Strongbridge Biopharma plc's net tangible assets is $44M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Net Tangible Assets
$44.39M
7.27% YoYΔ $-3.48M vs prior year quarter

Peer average / median

Loading

Strongbridge Biopharma plc Net Tangible Assets History

Loading

Strongbridge Biopharma plc vs. peers: Net Tangible Assets Comparison

Loading

Strongbridge Biopharma plc Net Tangible Assets Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Strongbridge Biopharma plc (SBBP) FAQ

Strongbridge Biopharma plc posts a net tangible assets of $44M as of June 2021. That compares with $48M in the prior-year period — down 7.3% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Strongbridge Biopharma plc's net tangible assets was $48M. The latest reading is $44M — a 7.3% year-over-year decrease (period ending June 2021). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Net Tangible Assets is one piece of Strongbridge Biopharma plc's financial statement story. At $44M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for SBBP's net tangible assets usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Strongbridge Biopharma plc's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Strongbridge Biopharma plc against Healthcare peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Healthcare are more comparable, which makes gaps in net tangible assets easier to interpret. Start with $44M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.