BackSilvercrest Asset Management Group Overview

Silvercrest Asset Management Group Receivables

Track Silvercrest Asset Management Group's receivables ($8.8M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Receivables
$8.83M
32.77% YoYΔ $-4.30M vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

Silvercrest Asset Management Group Receivables History

Loading

Silvercrest Asset Management Group vs. peers: Receivables Comparison

Loading

Silvercrest Asset Management Group Receivables Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Silvercrest Asset Management Group (SAMG) FAQ

Silvercrest Asset Management Group posts a receivables of $8.8M as of June 2026. That compares with $13M in the prior-year period — down 32.8% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Silvercrest Asset Management Group's receivables was $13M. The latest reading is $8.8M — a 32.8% year-over-year decrease (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Receivables is one piece of Silvercrest Asset Management Group's financial statement story. At $8.8M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for SAMG's receivables usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Silvercrest Asset Management Group's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Silvercrest Asset Management Group against Finance peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Finance are more comparable, which makes gaps in receivables easier to interpret. Start with $8.8M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.