BackRayonier Advanced Materials Overview

Rayonier Advanced Materials Net Tangible Assets

Rayonier Advanced Materials's net tangible assets is $210M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Net Tangible Assets
$206.93M
41.72% YoYΔ $-148.15M vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

Rayonier Advanced Materials Net Tangible Assets History

Loading

Rayonier Advanced Materials vs. peers: Net Tangible Assets Comparison

Loading

Rayonier Advanced Materials Net Tangible Assets Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Rayonier Advanced Materials (RYAM) FAQ

Rayonier Advanced Materials posts a net tangible assets of $210M as of June 2026. That compares with $360M in the prior-year period — down 41.7% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Rayonier Advanced Materials's net tangible assets was $360M. The latest reading is $210M — a 41.7% year-over-year decrease (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Net Tangible Assets is one piece of Rayonier Advanced Materials's financial statement story. At $210M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for RYAM's net tangible assets usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Rayonier Advanced Materials's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Rayonier Advanced Materials against Consumer Discretionary peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Consumer Discretionary are more comparable, which makes gaps in net tangible assets easier to interpret. Start with $210M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.