BackRedwood Trust - 9% NT REDEEM 01/09/2029 USD 25 Overview

Redwood Trust - 9% NT REDEEM 01/09/2029 USD 25 Total Liabilities

Track Redwood Trust - 9% NT REDEEM 01/09/2029 USD 25's total liabilities ($28B) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Total Liabilities
$27.88B

Peer average

Loading

Redwood Trust - 9% NT REDEEM 01/09/2029 USD 25 Total Liabilities History

Loading

Redwood Trust - 9% NT REDEEM 01/09/2029 USD 25 vs. peers: Total Liabilities Comparison

Loading

Redwood Trust - 9% NT REDEEM 01/09/2029 USD 25 Total Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Redwood Trust - 9% NT REDEEM 01/09/2029 USD 25 (RWTO) FAQ

Redwood Trust - 9% NT REDEEM 01/09/2029 USD 25 posts a total liabilities of $28B as of June 2026. In the prior-year period, the figure was $0. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Redwood Trust - 9% NT REDEEM 01/09/2029 USD 25's total liabilities was $0. The latest reading is $28B (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Total Liabilities is one piece of Redwood Trust - 9% NT REDEEM 01/09/2029 USD 25's financial statement story. At $28B, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for RWTO's total liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Redwood Trust - 9% NT REDEEM 01/09/2029 USD 25's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Redwood Trust - 9% NT REDEEM 01/09/2029 USD 25 against Finance peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Finance are more comparable, which makes gaps in total liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $28B here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.