BackRVL Pharmaceuticals plc Overview

RVL Pharmaceuticals plc Total Current Liabilities

Latest total current liabilities for RVLP: $68M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Total Current Liabilities
$68.39M
268.59% YoYΔ $49.84M vs prior year quarter

Peer average / median

Loading

RVL Pharmaceuticals plc Total Current Liabilities History

Loading

RVL Pharmaceuticals plc vs. peers: Total Current Liabilities Comparison

Loading

RVL Pharmaceuticals plc Total Current Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

RVL Pharmaceuticals plc (RVLP) FAQ

RVL Pharmaceuticals plc posts a total current liabilities of $68M as of June 2023. That compares with $19M in the prior-year period — up 268.6% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, RVL Pharmaceuticals plc's total current liabilities was $19M. The latest reading is $68M — a 268.6% year-over-year increase (period ending June 2023). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Total Current Liabilities is one piece of RVL Pharmaceuticals plc's financial statement story. At $68M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for RVLP's total current liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; RVL Pharmaceuticals plc's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging RVL Pharmaceuticals plc against Healthcare peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Healthcare are more comparable, which makes gaps in total current liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $68M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.