BackReShape Lifesciences Overview

ReShape Lifesciences Total Current Liabilities

Track ReShape Lifesciences's total current liabilities ($1.9M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Total Current Liabilities
$1.86M
41.71% YoYΔ $-1.33M vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

ReShape Lifesciences Total Current Liabilities History

Loading

ReShape Lifesciences vs. peers: Total Current Liabilities Comparison

Loading

ReShape Lifesciences Total Current Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

ReShape Lifesciences (RSLS) FAQ

ReShape Lifesciences posts a total current liabilities of $1.9M as of June 2026. That compares with $3.2M in the prior-year period — down 41.7% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, ReShape Lifesciences's total current liabilities was $3.2M. The latest reading is $1.9M — a 41.7% year-over-year decrease (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Total Current Liabilities is one piece of ReShape Lifesciences's financial statement story. At $1.9M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for RSLS's total current liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; ReShape Lifesciences's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging ReShape Lifesciences against Healthcare peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Healthcare are more comparable, which makes gaps in total current liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $1.9M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.