BackRover Group- Warrants (29/07/2026) Overview

Rover Group- Warrants (29/07/2026) Goodwill

Rover Group- Warrants (29/07/2026)'s goodwill is $33M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Goodwill
$33.16M
↓ 10.67% YoYΔ $-3.96M vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

Rover Group- Warrants (29/07/2026) Goodwill History

Loading

Rover Group- Warrants (29/07/2026) vs. peers: Goodwill Comparison

Loading

Rover Group- Warrants (29/07/2026) Goodwill Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Rover Group- Warrants (29/07/2026) (ROVRW) FAQ

Rover Group- Warrants (29/07/2026) posts a goodwill of $33M as of September 2023. That compares with $37M in the prior-year period — down 10.7% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Rover Group- Warrants (29/07/2026)'s goodwill was $37M. The latest reading is $33M — a 10.7% year-over-year decrease (period ending September 2023). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Goodwill is one piece of Rover Group- Warrants (29/07/2026)'s financial statement story. At $33M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for ROVRW's goodwill usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Rover Group- Warrants (29/07/2026)'s other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Rover Group- Warrants (29/07/2026) against Consumer Discretionary peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Consumer Discretionary are more comparable, which makes gaps in goodwill easier to interpret. Start with $33M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.